|
Score
|
Label
|
Description
|
|
6
|
Exemplary
|
Give a complete response with clear, coherent explanation; shows work
or diagrams; communicates answer effectively to audience; shows understanding
of open-ended problem’s; identifies important elements of the problem
|
|
5
|
Competent
|
Give fairly complete response with reasonably clear explanations; may
show work; communicates answer effectively to audience; shows understand of
the problem and process; identifies important elements of the problem
|
|
4
|
Minor Flaws but Satisfactory
|
Completes the problem satisfactorily, but explanation not complete;
shown work may be inappropriate or unclear; understands the mathematical
idea; uses math ideas effectively
|
|
3
|
Serious Flaws but Nearly Satisfactory
|
Begins problem correctly but may fail to complete or omits important
parts; fails to show understanding of mathematical ideas and processes; make
major computational errors; misuse or fail to use mathematical terms;
response may reflect an inappropriate way of solving
|
|
2
|
Begins but fails to complete problems
|
Explanation is not understandable; work is unclear; show no
understanding of the problem; make major computational errors
|
|
1
|
Unable to begin effectively
|
Words do not reflect the problem; work misrepresents the problem;
copies parts of the problem without attempting a solution; does not show what
information is important to the problem
|
Monday, May 21, 2012
Holistic Rubric
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment